Installer introduces is very small, typically around 2 to 3 Mb, versus the 15 Mb to 20 Mb that a bundled JRE requires. InstallBuilder are native applications that do not require any runtime to be present in the system to run. So, how does InstallBuilder address these issues? Installers generated with The above is not intended as a rant against Java-based installers, rather as an illustration of the challenges that a cross End-users react much more favorably to setup applications that are responsiveĪnd provide a familiar native interface, even if the functionality is identical. Performance and lack of a truly native look-and-feel. Finally, andĪlthough alternative toolkits like SWT finally emerged, Java GUI development has traditionally suffered from poor For large installers, this can be a time-consuming step andĪnother source of installation-related issues if the end-user runs out of disk space during this process. Java-based installers also require a self-extraction step, in which theįiles are first unpacked to disk before installation can begin. Significantly the footprint of the installation. Machine, which increases the chances of something going wrong if one is not present or the one present is not a suitable version.Īlternatively, if the user decides to bundle a JRE with the installer in order to avoid these potential problems, it will increase For example, it requires a Java runtime environment to be present in the Major drawbacks when the goal is to create setup programs. Scenarios and indeed over half of your users use InstallBuilder to package Java-based applications. These were built using the Java programming language. To fully understand the architecture and capabilities of InstallBuilder, it is useful to consider the previous generation ofĬross-platform installers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |